A quick search turns up very few top academics on social networks. Pity that. In a world of collaboration, easily accessed networks could be really useful for finding like-minded colleagues. I do understand some of the reticence, like non-disclaimer agreements and intellectual property rights. Universities do have these sewn up pretty tight, as it can be a very good earner for all parties.
But does it send the wrong message to students and colleagues alike? For example, it may say 'I'm not approachable' or 'I don't need to embrace new ideas'. Universities are meant to be places to explore and experiment. If we as scientists only do what we have always done, how will we ever progress? There is an analogy here. Year after year, the same final year student projects are offered. They were boring last year and they are boring this year.
Today's students are connected. They come to university with expectations that their skills will be expanded, not just academically. These transferable skills are invaluable in life. When used correctly, judiciously, the social media networks are not just glamorous, they can be very hard-working too.
So why not encourage your tutors and lecturers to dip a toe in the SMN environment. It's fun in here. On Twitter, agree on a hash tag for your group, which will help to keep you all together.
Just because you are communicating better, doesn't mean you are giving up state secrets or your rights. Carefully chosen group members and discerning followers can enrich your research experience. And more often than not, there will always be someone out there.
Follow @Shackleford_LB